MRD
ZENBEXUS + Dd delivered deep responses, with ~2x MRD-negative ≥CR1
MRD-NEGATIVE ≥CR RATES AT ANY TIME1*†
Data reported on this page are based on the primary efficacy population for MRD negativity, which included the first 420 patients randomized to the ZENBEXUS + Dd 1 mg arm (n=207) or the comparator DVd arm (n=213).1
*Response was based on Independent Review Committee (IRC) assessment per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) 2016 criteria.1
†Based on a threshold of 10-5 using a Hematogenix Next Generation Flow Cytometry assay.1
‡The 2-stage combined one-sided p-value based on Miettinen-Nurminen with CMH weights, stratified by number of prior lines (1 vs 2), age (≤70 vs >70), and ISS staging (I and II vs III).1
Sustained MRD-negative ≥CR
SUSTAINED MRD-NEGATIVE ≥CR RATES WITH ZDd IN PATIENTS WHO ACHIEVED MRD-NEGATIVE ≥CR2*†
94% for ≥6 months
(n=34/36)
80% for ≥12 months
(n=8/10)
For DVd, 89% sustained for ≥6 months (n=16/18) and 56% for ≥12 months (n=5/9)2†
*This includes patients who, at the time of data cutoff, had an evaluable MRD bone marrow aspirate without indeterminate status 6 (or 12) months after achieving MRD-negative ≥CR.2
†Limitations: This exploratory analysis was not powered to detect differences in treatment effect. No statistical testing was planned for this analysis; therefore, definitive conclusions should not be drawn. Evaluable MRD samples for assessing sustainability were not available for a substantial proportion of patients who achieved MRD-negative ≥CR at this data cutoff point.
The FDA uses MRD-negative ≥CR to support accelerated approval in MM3§
§Based on ODAC consensus, MRD can be used as an endpoint to support accelerated approval in MM based on single-arm trials or randomized trials. Given that time-to-event endpoints such as PFS and OS are also interpretable in randomized trials, sponsors can conduct one trial evaluating MRD for accelerated approval, with the trial continuing to evaluate later time-to-event endpoints (eg, PFS/OS) to support traditional approval.3
APP=advanced practice provider; CMH=Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel; CR=complete response; Dd=daratumumab and hyaluronidase-fihj and dexamethasone; DVd=daratumumab and hyaluronidase-fihj, bortezomib, and dexamethasone; FDA=US Food and Drug Administration; MM=multiple myeloma; MOA=mechanism of action; MRD=minimal residual disease; ODAC=Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee; OS=overall survival; PFS=progression-free survival; ZDd=ZENBEXUS, daratumumab and hyaluronidase-fihj, and dexamethasone.
Key Subgroups
In patients refractory to lenalidomide in the immediate prior line, ZENBEXUS + Dd showed consistent efficacy2
ZDd MRD-NEGATIVE ≥CR RATES1,2
24% (n=20/83) of patients who were refractory to lenalidomide in the immediate prior line achieved MRD-negative ≥CR after receiving DVd2
Limitations: This exploratory analysis was not powered to detect differences in treatment effect. No statistical testing was planned for this analysis; therefore, definitive conclusions should not be drawn.
Response was based on Independent Review Committee (IRC) assessment per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) 2016 criteria.1
CR=complete response; Dd=daratumumab and hyaluronidase-fihj and dexamethasone; DVd=daratumumab and hyaluronidase-fihj, bortezomib, and dexamethasone; MRD=minimal residual disease; ZDd=ZENBEXUS, daratumumab and hyaluronidase-fihj, and dexamethasone.
MRD-negative ≥CR rates were consistent across key subgroups2
Response was based on Independent Review Committee (IRC) assessment per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) 2016 criteria.1
Limitations: This exploratory analysis was not powered to detect the difference in treatment effect. No statistical testing was planned for this analysis; therefore, definitive conclusions should not be drawn.
CI=confidence interval; Dd=daratumumab and hyaluronidase-fihj and dexamethasone; DVd=daratumumab and hyaluronidase-fihj, bortezomib, and dexamethasone; eGFR=estimated glomerular filtration rate; ISS=International Staging System; ZDd=ZENBEXUS, daratumumab and hyaluronidase-fihj, and dexamethasone.
ZENBEXUS + Dd delivered higher ≥CR rates vs DVd2
Limitations: This exploratory analysis was not powered to detect differences in treatment effect. No statistical testing was planned for this analysis; therefore, definitive conclusions should not be drawn.
In the ZDd arm, the CR was 16% (n=34/207) and the sCR was 29% (n=61/207).2
In the DVd arm, the CR was 14% (n=29/213) and the sCR was 11% (n=24/213).2
≥CR includes both complete response and stringent complete response. Response was based on Independent Review Committee (IRC) assessment per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) 2016 criteria.1
CR=complete response; Dd=daratumumab and hyaluronidase-fihj and dexamethasone; DVd=daratumumab and hyaluronidase-fihj, bortezomib, and dexamethasone; PR=partial response; VGPR=very good partial response; sCR=stringent complete response; ZDd=ZENBEXUS, daratumumab and hyaluronidase-fihj, and dexamethasone.
Familiar Safety
Profile1,4,5
Learn more about the safety profile and discontinuations due to ARs*
Get Certified to
Prescribe ZENBEXUS
ZENBEXUS is only available through a restricted distribution program called ZENBEXUS REMS
BMS Access Support
Get access to BMS medications to help prescribe ZENBEXUS
*The most common ARs (≥20%) in the ZDd arm and DVd arm, respectively, were upper respiratory tract infection (54% and 52%), fatigue (36% and 33%), musculoskeletal pain (35% and 33%), pneumonia (34% and 17%), diarrhea (33% and 36%), motor dysfunction (26% and 17%), rash (26% and 15%), sleep disorder (25% and 28%), hypogammaglobulinemia (24% and 12%), COVID-19 (23% and 16%), and constipation (20% and 22%).1
References: 1. ZENBEXUS [package insert]. Princeton, NJ: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; 2026. 2. Data on file. BMS-REF-00030-2070. Princeton, NJ: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; 2026. 3. Landgren O, Devlin SM. Blood Cancer Discov. 2025;6:13-22. 4. Dimopoulos MA, Oriol A, Nahi H, et al. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(14):1319-1331. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1607751 5. Dimopoulos MA, Terpos E, Boccadoro M, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22(6):801-812. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00128-5